Procedural flexibity has its limits when evidence filed late
In Television Food Network, GP v Food Channel Network Pty Ltd [2008] FCA 378 (18 March 2008) counsel for the respondent, Food Channel Network Pty Ltd (FCN) sought leave of the Court to file two affidavits, one of which was only provided to counsel for the applicant, Television Food Network, GP (TFN) 10 minutes prior to Court resuming one morning during the trial.
TFN objected to the admissibility of the affidavits in their entirety and made some of the following submissions:
- no explanation as to the lateness of the evidence had been provided;
- the proposed evidence sought to advance a new case for the respondent and contradicts earlier evidence; and
- admission of such evidence would seriously prejudice the applicant.